honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Sunday, April 6, 2008

COMMENTARY
Managed care could offset healthcare costs

By Max Botticelli, M.D.

It makes sense to treat a simple headache with an aspirin. If the headache persists, it makes sense to examine whether it's a symptom of a much more serious malady.

So it is with our healthcare. For years now, we've been living with the headache of rising healthcare costs without fully examining its causes, leaving the industry in a state of hyperinflation — a critical condition.

The Congressional Budget Office Report, "The Long Term Outlook for Health Care Spending," concludes that unless something is done, "federal spending on health care will reach unsustainable levels." According to this report, in 1960 healthcare spending as a percent of Gross Domestic Product was about 5 percent. In 2005, it was 14.9 percent and it is projected to reach 25 percent in 2025 and 49 percent in 2082.

The consequences of healthcare hyperinflation are obvious: we have less money to cover other basic necessities; employer-based health insurance programs are threatened; the number of uninsured has increased; Medicare and Medicaid continue to reduce reimbursements to providers with the result that more physicians, struggling to cover costs that include hefty malpractice insurance premiums, are deciding to leave.

It is convenient, but misdirected, to focus on health plans and premium rates as the problem. According to the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, health insurance premiums grew 7.2 percent a year from 1993 to 2003, while healthcare costs grew 7.3 percent a year during the same period. Premium rates do not drive costs — costs drive premium rates. They are a symptom of a problem with multiple causes:

  • Problems with the quality of care. These have been identified by the report of the NIH Institute of Medicine, National Roundtable on Health Care Quality: overuse, or unnecessary care such as prescribing antibiotics to treat a common cold; underuse, such as inadequate use of mammograms and other effective preventive tools; and misuse, such as preventable drug interactions. Problems with overuse, misuse and underuse account for an estimated 30 percent of total healthcare costs!

  • Consumer demand. Consumer demand for health-care services results from new and expensive medical treatments and an aging population. But our unhealthy lifestyles are also a major contributor. Obesity, inactivity and tobacco use account for a significant portion of total healthcare spending. In addition, consumers, unaware of the value of the drugs and services they receive, are not as frugal as they are when they buy food, clothing and household goods.

  • Malpractice insurance and defensive medicine. Malpractice insurance and overuse resulting from defensive medicine — the practice of ordering additional diagnostic tests and drugs to protect against malpractice suits — contribute significantly to healthcare costs.

  • Hospital and physician reimbursements. Physician providers are paid according to the quantity of services they provide. To increase income to cover increased business costs or personal expenses, they must increase either the number of patients they care for or the frequency of visits from the same number of patients. Thus, the steady reduction of Medicare and Medicaid provider reimbursements has encouraged overuse and discouraged acceptance of chronically ill patients who require more time.

    The solution? Managed care.

    We may not like it, but managed care is the only real solution available to deflate the ballooning cost of healthcare. Most national health programs manage care by rationing, or reducing the availability of services. Another model manages use through gate-keeping. Both work but are unlikely to be embraced by Americans.

    More acceptable, perhaps, are the following solutions:

  • Consumer-directed health plans which make consumers more responsible for their healthcare decisions.

  • Pay for performance, which reimburses providers for the quality rather than the quantity of services they provide.

  • Value-based insurance plans that remove financial barriers to preventive services and chronic disease management while increasing consumer financial responsibility for less valuable services.

  • Worksite wellness programs that engage employers in efforts to improve the health of their employees.

    The reward for bringing healthcare inflation under control is huge. It would improve Medicare financing, allow Medicaid to expand its programs to include at least some of the uninsured, reduce healthcare costs for employers, increase access to physicians and hospitals and, most importantly, improve the quality of healthcare for those who need it.

    Can it happen? You bet your life. But only if we begin focusing on the causes of healthcare hyperinflation rather than the symptoms.

    Max G. Botticelli, M.D., is chief executive officer of University Health Alliance. He wrote this commentary for The Advertiser.