honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Thursday, October 5, 2006

Five charged in HP spy scandal

By James S. Granelli, Marc Lifsher and Jim Puzzanghera
Los Angeles Times

Hewlett-Packard was once considered so button-down that it was synonymous with honesty and fair dealing. Now, the company has raised questions about heavy-handed tactics of big corporations.

PAUL SAKUMA | Associated Press

spacer spacer

Patricia C. Dunn

spacer spacer

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The former chairwoman of Hewlett-Packard Co. and four others were charged with felonies yesterday for their roles in a clandestine probe to root out the source of boardroom media leaks at the Silicon Valley icon.

California Attorney General Bill Lockyer filed four felony counts against Patricia C. Dunn, who resigned last month from HP's board after supervising a cloak-and-dagger investigation that included obtaining private phone records through subterfuge, tailing HP directors and sending computer spyware to a reporter.

Also charged were Kevin T. Hunsaker, the former HP ethics officer who oversaw the investigation; Ronald DeLia, the Massachusetts private investigator who carried it out; Matthew DePante, owner of a Florida data-brokering company that provided confidential phone records; and DePante employee Bryan Wagner of Colorado.

Notably, though, HP Chief Executive Mark Hurd was not accused of wrongdoing, which sent the company's shares to a six-year high as Wall Street hoped the saga was drawing to a close.

Dunn and the others are accused in a complaint filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court of using false pretenses to obtain confidential information from a public utility; unauthorized access to computer data; identity theft; and conspiracy to commit each of those crimes.

If convicted, the five could each face as much as 12 years in state prison and $65,000 in fines.

Dunn and DeLia denied the charges yesterday. Hunsaker's lawyer, Michael N. Pancer of San Diego, and DePante's lawyer, Richard J. Preira of Miami Beach, didn't return phone calls. Wagner could not be reached.

An HP spokesman said the company would continue to cooperate with state and federal investigators, but had no further comment yesterday.

Unlike the accounting manipulation of previous scandals at Enron Corp. or WorldCom, the HP case highlighted the precarious notion of personal privacy in the Internet age and raised questions about the heavy-handed tactics of big corporations.

"Privacy issues have been put in a light that simply has not existed before," said James Post, a Boston University business professor and lawyer. "That's what makes this a landmark case. This is going to be the reference point for decades in the clash of personal privacy and the corporate need to know."

Lockyer said at a press conference that the state takes privacy crimes seriously and that "those who crossed the legal line must be held accountable."

The scandal has riveted Silicon Valley since it was revealed Sept. 5. In the intervening weeks, Lockyer, the FBI, Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission all launched their own investigations into the Palo Alto company once considered so button-down that the "HP Way" was synonymous with honesty and fair dealing.

For investors, the chief worry was that the revelations might taint Hurd, the low-profile chief executive recruited last year to turn around HP's flagging fortunes after the firing of former CEO Carly Fiorina.

Lockyer and his attorneys said yesterday that the investigation "remains active" and other people could be named in related criminal complaints in the future. He said that, to date, his investigation has uncovered "no evidence that Mark Hurd engaged in criminal conduct."

"I think they could put the whole board in jail and Wall Street would not care," said Daniel Morgan, a portfolio manager at Synovus Investment Advisors. "Until Hurd is implicated in some sort of criminal charges that would prevent him from continuing to lead the company, the stock market has distanced itself from the boardroom soap opera."

Lockyer's complaint alleges that Dunn understood that investigators were using ruses to obtain phone records and even provided the home and cell-phone numbers of fellow directors so their call logs could be viewed.